<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All About Stocks and Bonds (repost)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/</link>
	<description>Personal finance blog for college students, recent graduates and everyone else -- including entrepreneurship -- for getting rich. Featured in the Wall Street Journal and New York Times.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:46:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe W.</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kieno, that&#039;s what I was looking for.  Any ideas why Amazon and Yahoo!&#039;s P/B are so different?  Amazon&#039;s seems astronomical (60.56) compared to Yahoo&#039;s (5.84).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kieno, that&#8217;s what I was looking for.  Any ideas why Amazon and Yahoo!&#8217;s P/B are so different?  Amazon&#8217;s seems astronomical (60.56) compared to Yahoo&#8217;s (5.84).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t indicate exactly what kind of bond was giving ~ 2.89% back in April of 2004 so it is difficult to compare.  If you had purchased an I Bond in April of 2004 it would have started at 6.83%.  Since then it would have changed to 6.73%, 6.93% and 6.73%.  Well above the 2.89% rate you noted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t indicate exactly what kind of bond was giving ~ 2.89% back in April of 2004 so it is difficult to compare.  If you had purchased an I Bond in April of 2004 it would have started at 6.83%.  Since then it would have changed to 6.73%, 6.93% and 6.73%.  Well above the 2.89% rate you noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabs</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>The only way you&#039;d lose money on a goverment bond is if the government defaulted on its loans--and it doesn&#039;t do that, it just prints more money.
I imagine you are talking about American bonds, but for the record Russia defaulted on its bonds in 1998.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way you&#8217;d lose money on a goverment bond is if the government defaulted on its loans&#8211;and it doesn&#8217;t do that, it just prints more money.</p>
<p>I imagine you are talking about American bonds, but for the record Russia defaulted on its bonds in 1998.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>I know this is probably a &quot;newbie&quot; question, but I read an article recently that talked about the &quot;Magic Formula&quot; at
www.MagicFormulaInvesting.com
and I&#039;m curious as to your thoughts. from what I understand, it puts the P/E ratio on its head in a sense, going on return on capital... it seems like it uses the P/E ratio in regard to its market capitalization. I guess thats how its &quot;magic&quot; needless to say, I&#039;m just curious what some of your thoughts would be on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is probably a &#8220;newbie&#8221; question, but I read an article recently that talked about the &#8220;Magic Formula&#8221; at<br />
<a href="http://www.MagicFormulaInvesting.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MagicFormulaInvesting.com</a><br />
and I&#8217;m curious as to your thoughts. from what I understand, it puts the P/E ratio on its head in a sense, going on return on capital&#8230; it seems like it uses the P/E ratio in regard to its market capitalization. I guess thats how its &#8220;magic&#8221; needless to say, I&#8217;m just curious what some of your thoughts would be on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieno</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>Well to be more specific P/E = Price divided by earnings.  It is a measurement of stockholder enthusiasm.  How much the market is willing pay for the earnings.  It goes without saying that growth tech stocks like Google carry astronomical P/Es because they have lots of growth potential and the price is based on future earnings, not past or present earnings.
Price to Book Value (P/B) is a ratio of the price of the stock to the bottom line: assets and free cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well to be more specific P/E = Price divided by earnings.  It is a measurement of stockholder enthusiasm.  How much the market is willing pay for the earnings.  It goes without saying that growth tech stocks like Google carry astronomical P/Es because they have lots of growth potential and the price is based on future earnings, not past or present earnings.</p>
<p>Price to Book Value (P/B) is a ratio of the price of the stock to the bottom line: assets and free cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric N.</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1938</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1938</guid>
		<description>Joe W. ... PE = P/E = Price over Earnings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe W. &#8230; PE = P/E = Price over Earnings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe W.</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>Is there a ratio that tells you a stock&#039;s price in relation to the company&#039;s assets and profits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a ratio that tells you a stock&#8217;s price in relation to the company&#8217;s assets and profits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1936</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1936</guid>
		<description>&gt;If it does well, your stock will &gt;do well.
Shouldn&#039;t it read something more like:
&quot;If it does well, your stock may or may not do well, depending on market conditions, the health of that firm&#039;s industry, and investor perception of how the company is performing&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>If it does well, your stock will >do well.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t it read something more like: </p>
<p>&#8220;If it does well, your stock may or may not do well, depending on market conditions, the health of that firm&#8217;s industry, and investor perception of how the company is performing&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Young</title>
		<link>http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/all-about-stocks-and-bonds-repost#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>Great info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

