Stop being cheap and go buy something valuable today

Posted at 10:56 on Tuesday September 12, 2006 | Filed Under Investing , Saving

Let's start the week off right: with me getting really angry and threatening to throw heavy things at people.

Guys, I am so tired of hearing about young people sabotaging themselves by being cheap. Not frugal, cheap. (There's a difference.) Let me tell you why using an example from the recent IWillTeachYouToBeRich chat I recently held.

During the chat, someone asked me what I was going to do with the site in the future, and I mentioned how I was interested in using different types of media like podcasts, videos, etc. There was a lot of enthusiasm: "Yeah, Ramit!" they said, "you should do it!"

Then I decided to test the lovey-dovey emotions that we were all feeling. See, I've been getting lots of requests to do a regular podcast, but it's a lot of work to do a really good one. That's why I've been playing with the idea of charging for them.

Oh, man. When I mentioned this in the chat room, people went apeshit. They were dead set against it, and I watched the mood go from Kumbaya-happiness to dark indignation. Curious, I thought. Actually, I thought it was completely stupid, and here's why:

Before I went nuts, I asked people, why not charge? And the reasons I got back were so breathtakingly absurd that I actually stripped out people's names.

person1: don't charge though
person2: yeah, please don't charge
person3: I have universtiy debts to pay for... =... O(
person4: It feels punitive
person5: your good karma will come back to you muliplied if you do not charge
person6: because people dont want to pay lol my guess is you will lose many readers if they have to pay
person7: No charge....comeon! you cant ask us to pay to learn saving :)
person8: one thing that would concern me if you charged is that the quality of material would need to match the fee
person9: i think you should charge. you weed out the ppl who aren't willing to make basic investments in their investments
person10: dont charge
person11: frankly your latest work hasn't been great ;(
person12: we cheap :P don't charge. we hear to save money here XD
person13: suze orman does not charge for her show
person14: Dude, there are people who CAN'T pay. (Me, for example, here in Bangladesh, I don't have a way to pay for stuff in the web.)
person15: you've been giving out quality information for free, i think i've gotten used to it...
person16: Charging is not a succesful business model for editorial content on the web, currently
person17: people dont know what the advice is worth before getting it but you have to pay first
person18: you will NOT attract new audience members by charging....existing ones, maybe
person19: Payment is a barrier between the reader and the important information; I would think you of all people would understand how dangerous it is to erect even minor barriers for people.

Seeing this really pissed me off. In fact, these reasons are so ridiculous that I almost took out a sledgehammer and smashed my monitor, Hollywood-style.

Listen, if I decide to charge for podcasts--which I haven't decided yet--then you can decide if they're valuable enough to pay for. But please don't use dumb excuses like "How can you expect me to pay when I'm trying to save?" and "I'm used to free stuff."

The truth is that most young people don't understand the value of money. Ooh, yeah, I said it. We don't differentiate between cost and value. We'll happily spend money eating out, drinking, or going to movies, but when it comes to paying for content or other valuable items--things you consider an investment--we balk. We've gotten used to everything being free, and when things start costing money, the result is a panicked "no way!" reaction. How do I know? Because I'm a young guy, and a few years ago I was saying stupid stuff like the above quotes, too.

* * *

When I was younger, I tried to save money on everything, whether it was a Coke or a major purchase like an iPod. I understand being on that end of the gradient. Now that I'm earning money, though, I see the value in spending money on things beyond eating out. Person9's comment spoke to me:

"person9: i think you should charge. you weed out the ppl who aren't willing to make basic investments in their investments"

Frankly, if you'd told me to spend more money on certain things back then, I would have ignored you. But hopefully you're smarter than my past self. Also, you might have read enough on this site to know that spending on the things you love is perfectly ok.

Ben Casnocha put it well when he wrote this:

"What are the best corners to cut? In the Google cafeteria, the food is awesome, and the chairs and tables are pieces of shit. That's a great example of cutting the right corners."

Right on. Today, I see young people sabotaging themselves all the time by being cheap about the wrong things. "I'm not going to buy that book! It costs $27.95!" they say, not realizing that the book could inspire them to do something that would make them $10,000. That's a 357x return. Or, "I'm not going to spend $15.00 on the more expensive cellphone plan--that's ridiculous!" No, what's ridiculous is you then not monitoring your usage and ending up spending $58.00 in overage fees in one month.

"But Ramit," you might say, hiding behind a wall because of the mallet I am holding on this angry Tuesday, "how do I know that $30 book will pay off? What if I don't get anything from it?" Jesus Christ, you don't know! That's called taking a risk! Unfortunately, I see a lot of people nickel-and-diming the really important things that could pay off explosively.

Instead of being guided by the invisible hand of stupidity, take some conscious control of your spending. Are you just spending on eating out? When was the last time you spent money strategically to try to gain something useful? Yes, it's actually good to spend money on things you value. Yes, it's important to spend money on things that will benefit you financially, intellectually, whatever. Yes, I'm encouraging you to spend money on certain things! In fact, here are some of the subscriptions and things I've spent money on:

  • A subscription to Before & After Magazine, to improve my design skills
  • A subscription to the Rhapsody music service, because I like finding new music without having to wait
  • A Rowenta iron, because I love ironing

This point of this isn't to brag about how much I spend on stuff. Heh, frankly, it's not that much in the grand scheme. And it's a little different than my posts on Irrational But Good Things To Buy and Cost vs. Value. The point is to differentiate between spending on fun, and spending on things you consider investments.

In the quotes from the chat above, one guy said something like, 'How can I spend money on a podcast when you expect me to save?' Let's get real here: Assuming the podcast (or whatever) is worth paying for, then you need to think more about whether it's an investment or a simple cost. Does it have the potential to make you happy? Beyond that, could it give you the potential to make more than the cost of the podcast? Is there a trial or a refund policy? Is there some magical way of of judging if you think the content will be good (like maybe 2 YEARS OF POSTS?!?)?

This post isn't just about my hypothetical podcasts, and it's not about going to buy that iPod/coat/car you've really been wanting. It's about not being cheap. It's about using your money strategically by realizing what's an investment and what's not. So here's what I want you to do. This week, go find something valuable you want to spend money on--and then go buy it. Yes, I'm telling you to go spend money on something you love and something that will benefit you in some way. Do me a favor and add a comment here telling us what you bought. Bonus points if you spend money on something that will turn your money into 10x what you spent (e.g., a good business book or buying lunch for your mentor to get his advice). Remember: You control your spending.

DONE READING?
Now you can leave your own comment or subscribe to the newsletter

Comments (42)

1.

Great post!

Posted by RimGuru at September 12, 2006 11:40 AM
2.

He huffed, and he puffed and he blew the house down. Just kidding Ramit. On the one hand I can see why this would upset you, but on the other hand, what did you expect?


To be honest, your posts are in the top 99.9% of all blog posts on the web. The fact that I can get more out of one of your personal finance articles than an entire semester of personal finance at an Ivy League School should tell you something.


But since you have yet to charge for content, or even have ads on your site (which personally I think you are crazy for) our perception is that you would always give us unlimited-Ramit-inspirations free of charge.


It might be cool if you went at it like MarketingSherpa, where you release the podcast for a week to your newsletter list and then after that week people would have to pay. As a result, I think your newsletter list would grow a lot faster, of which you could supplement some income with a few text link ads in each newsletter.


Or you could just charge, either way, you’ve got my attention.

Posted by Dave Martin at September 12, 2006 11:45 AM
3.

Ah, my friend, I have to say that my favorite part of this post was, "like maybe 2 YEARS OF POSTS?!" That was *golden*.


I for one will support either decision you make (on charging), knowing full well that the effort you would put into making a podcast, if even close to the effort you put into this blog, will be WELL WORTH IT!

Posted by Jim English at September 12, 2006 11:51 AM
4.

Get your sledgehammer out, because I'm about to talk about charging.


One effect I've noticed over time is this: desperate people will spend money on something, only to be disappointed that it won't fix their problem quickly, and then they abandon it.


Be careful that you very clearly explain that the podcasts don't have all the answers, and that solid investments still take a long time to build.


It's not just financial desperation that can lead to this. Case in point, I once spent $40 (about 20% of my liquid assets at the time) on a new exercise outfit, thinking the cost would spur me into going to the gym again (kind of reverse-sunk-costs mentality). It didn't work.

Posted by Ben at September 12, 2006 11:59 AM
5.

Great Post! You're dead on the money when it comes to not being cheap. Being cheap all the time will drain your life of things you love (other than all the nickels and dimes you've collected)

Posted by Matt at September 12, 2006 12:08 PM
6.

Young people tends to ignore the value of advices because they have plenty of time to make mistakes and learn it the hard way.


It takes time to become wise.

Posted by nick at September 12, 2006 12:24 PM
7.

True enough. That is what I think when I go buy books, as long as they give me one good idea they are worth the dollars I spent on them.

Posted by Innovation Zen at September 12, 2006 12:28 PM
8.

Wow, looks like this really struck a chord with you. As well it should, this 'all content should be free' is stupid. People have many times commented on your own site about charging money for a product = evil (usually refering to Dave Ramsey - whose radio show is free online, BTW). Some of your readers somehow perceive you and your site as being more legitimate since you aren't selling something. Thus, you now start talking about charging for some content and you've now joined the 'evil ones'. What did they expect from someone who talks constantly about entrepreneurship?? Does your readership not think that you will ever have a book to sell? Or ebook? Or podcast? Or whathaveyou?


Also - and I know I risk you filtering this comment out by saying this - I must say that it does not look like your "2006 Money Makeover" is working so well if your loyal following are not willing/able to shell out a few buck for a podcast. I mean, seriously - It's not like you're going to charge $50 per podcast...

Posted by debt-free at September 12, 2006 12:42 PM
9.

I'd prefer that your podcasts cost something. However, you need to understand that I now have higher expectations from your podcasts compared to your blog. I'd no longer be a user, but a real customer, and as a customer I have an expectation of value.


As you say, you don't want to produce something bad because podcasts can vary in quality. If I'm paying, I expect better quality both in recording and in content. If I put down a dollar or two for your first podcast, and I don't get what I'm expecting than little is lost (who honestly can't part with a dollar or two for one trial? Now we're talking cheap). If I don't like it or see the value, I stop. If I like it and see value, I continue.


I don't like this "phenomenon" of free everything. I WANT to pay because then I know you have an obligation to me for providing quality, and I know that you think what you're offering has that value. It's up to me to decide if that's really true based on my values.


Also, there is no risk of losing readers because you add podcasts, but require payment for those. If there is good quality posting, then people will read. If the podcasts are better (or more entertaining, more fun, more emotional, more real, more interactive, more convenient, etc. or any combination of those), than some percent of your readers will pay.

Posted by MyNameIsMatt at September 12, 2006 01:00 PM
10.

First: I'd definitely pay for podcasts.


Second: Along similar lines, here's my purchases for the week (along with a bit of background).


I'm turning 20 next month, in college, and engaged to my live-in fiance. We both came from less-than-ideal family backgrounds, so this allows us to support each other fairly well.


I work full-time and spend about an hour a day stuck in the Orlando commute, so my first purchase is a short list of Audiobooks.


I've ALWAYS been one of those teenaged "No way I'm paying for music downloads" sorts of people, so this represents a huge shift for me. But now, I'll be able to put that hour to some better use, as opposed to the usual iPod playlists.


...My second purchase this week was a brand new Vespa. Since my fiance only drives a mile or two to work every day, we can eliminate one car, four tanks of gas per month, repairs, and half of our insurance. With a 49cc engine, no special licensing/education is required, and it's much more fun to ride.


Keep up the great work, Ramit!

Posted by Aaron at September 12, 2006 01:00 PM
11.

Another excellent post!


Your story just explains why some people never realize their dreams.


It's not by mistake that my favorite saying is: "Put your money where your mouth is!". And it's not about the money. It's about people being very generous with other people's money and resources, but very "frugal" with their own. About people being penny wise, and pound foolish. About using big words, but not translating them into facts.


A person who is not willing to pay for a step forward is a foolish person. There are very few truly free things in this world. Even reading this post costs money, because it costs time.


I am too poor to waste my life/time on (many of the) "free" things. Your blog being one of the exceptions. Be blessed!

Posted by Ervin J at September 12, 2006 01:07 PM
12.

I personally can't understand that you haven't adsensed iwillteachyoutoberich.com yet :S ... you must have your reasons!?


I enjoy online content the same way other people enjoy the TV... just getting the credit card up and waiting for the podcast to download would be too much trouble for me to bother.

Posted by Regin at September 12, 2006 01:14 PM
13.

Ultimately it comes down to *why* you want to leave a podcast on your website.


If you feel it is valuable content for your readers then you will do it. If it costs you more money than the value you get from providing the podcast you will have 2 choices to make.


Either you charge money to recover your costs (and possibly make a profit) or you won't. You won't add them to your site because the value to *you* does not outweigh the cost. It doesn't matter what your readers think.


Sometimes how a person defies the percieved "value" is what makes the difference in the end.


If your readers are not willing to pay to subsidize the podcasts... then these podcasts do not offer enough value to them. Anything a person values is something they will pay for - sometimes despite the cost.


Is your advice worth paying for?

Posted by Jason at September 12, 2006 01:35 PM
14.

I would like to start off by saying great post. Next up is a question, have people forgotten about their local libraries? I am in my late 30s but a lot of your readers are young, possibly still in college or grad school. There should be a library in walking/biking distance. To stick with your blog's subject matter, there are so many books on investing and personal finance it would be impossible to purchase them all. When I come across a book that I think might help or be of interest to me, I check my local library (online, no less). If they do not have the book, I check other area libraries and request it be sent to my local one (again, on-line). If the book was useful, I may purchase it for reference later on. I realize that not all of your readers are in the U.S., but for those that are the public library is a great commodity.

Posted by Heather at September 12, 2006 01:41 PM
15.

I agree with #9- MyNameIsMatt. If you start charging for podcasts you are going to have to crank up the value. I wouldn't pay for the content in this blog produced in a different medium.

Posted by amfoxline at September 12, 2006 02:03 PM
16.

Fantastic post.


I am a firm believer in 'you get what you pay for' and feel that you buy cheap, in the long you have cost yourself more money, then if you had simply bought quality to begin with. It may not always apply, but... It often does.


As for paying for podcasts, I'd pay, depending on price point and quality.


Lastly, being the huge music fan (and musician) I am, I intend on picking a new CD to listen to, enjoy, and learn from. Add to that purchase a new book (I have been eyeing a couple on teaching your children about investing). Niether will necessarily turn my $30 into $300 directly, but the former has the potential to save me money while the latter the potential increase savigns growth for my children over the next umpteen years.

Posted by Luke at September 12, 2006 02:06 PM
17.

If you were to charge for podcasts, I for one, would not purchase them. Also, I do not identify with the above persons in your chat, which is why I am posting, and why I hope this comment is helpful to you.


Me? I don't listen to podcasts, there are alternatives that are worth more time to me. Books, newspapers and other blogs come to mind. True, this blog is one of a kind, but there are other blogs that are more interesting and worth my time to read much of the time.


Reading your blog at this point has marginal additive to me--a lot of what you say I already do, and some of the others things you speak of I do not identify with. (Specific examples? I filled out your survey, so check out the responses on that).


You will lose marginal users such as me in a transition to a pay-for-podcast--yes, I will still read your blog through an RSS reader, alongside 10 other blogs, as I do now. However, if it means less content, I will of course, frequent your site less as well. But perhaps you want to attract the audience that is not me. That's completely understandable.


As to the rest of your post...d ifferent people have different views on things, and I for one, will not go and buy something valuable today. Yes, I could think of things to buy, but there are others things I have in mind that are worth more of my time today--one thing is writing this post. Not all valuable things cost money.


Don't worry, I spend money on things I enjoy--just not today.

Posted by Paul at September 12, 2006 02:31 PM
18.

debt-free said, "I must say that it does not look like your "2006 Money Makeover" is working so well if your loyal following are not willing/able to shell out a few buck for a podcast."


I am debt free and enjoy Ramit's good advice. Despite that, I still would not pay for a podcast, because I'm not that interested. Unless it was very cheap and I felt that it was worth it.


Dave Ramsey and Ramit give out mostly the same advice, so I don't know why there is some tension between the two's fans. The main difference I see is that Dave recommends NEVER using a credit card for any reason, which is something I disagree with but can understand his view. Both ways work well if the person themselves are motivated and consistent.

Posted by Jonathan at September 12, 2006 02:33 PM
19.

I wouldn't pay for podcasts because:
a) I don't listen to podcasts.
b) charging sets up a barrier between the random-surfer and your content.


I would imagine that most people on your site "randomly surfed" here from some other site, liked the content, and put the RSS feed into their reader.


If I randomly surfed here, and had to pay for content... I would have clicked the "back" button without a second thought. Not because I hate dishing out cash, but because I have to create an account, give you my credit card info, hope my card is charged appropriately, yadda, yadda.


At least for me, the psychological barrier is greater than the monetary barrier.

Posted by Adam Phillabaum at September 12, 2006 02:39 PM
20.

David Allen's Getting Things Done and Suze Orman's 9 Steps to Financial Freedom. ~2 weeks ago.


I was reluctant to spend the $20 (for both) after a summer of overspending. Best $20 ever spent.

Posted by Anna at September 12, 2006 02:49 PM
21.

Maybe we don't see your podcasts as valuable! You've been posting GREAT information for free for two years. You have made the standards of expectation high. People will be expecting way more if you charge for podcasts and that's what I mean by saying, "Maybe people don't equate your podcasts as being valuable, above the regular posts." Just because poeple say that they will not be buying your podcasts or future posts does not mean they do not spend money on valuable things. Your humor and emotionally expressive posts are an essential part of what makes this blog great but this post shows a very ugly side of you. I suppose the best thing is the dialogue created, another great part of your site.

Posted by Christina at September 12, 2006 03:08 PM
22.

Money recently well spent? Well, I havn't quite spent it...but it's about to be a computer cabinet I designed. My first job left me with enough money to pay rent, eat, and save a wee itty bit.


Then I got a new job with better pay and continued to live as though I was at the first job. Back in March I filled my free time by starting an online magazine for swing dancers and realized quickly that piles of paper all over the living room floor were not going to cut it.


So I sat down, checked out other computer cabinets and wrote down all the features I would use and need.


I'm moving to a cheaper neighborhood that is just as far from work and as nice as where I currently live. The cabinet builder has my design and is ready to go so that I have one less thing to lug up/down the stairs at moving time. $700 to make my life and time more organized is fine by me.


As for paying for a podcast...I wasn't in the chat, but I'm assuming the details were to vague for anyone to really be able to complain. I bet we can saftely assuming the full details weren't being discussed to say if the content/length of show/etc. would actually be worth paying for and what that would actually cost.


5min of being told not to buy lattes -- wouldn't pay. 30min of how to choose negotiate a lower rate on a credit card -- sure I'd pay a few dollars (it's not that much different than 99cents for a song....)

Posted by Christina at September 12, 2006 03:14 PM
23.

These comments are some of the best in recent memory. I'm seriously blown away that so many of you would be willing to pay for podcasts--assuming they're excellent, which of course I'd try to make them--and I appreciate the other perspectives, too.


But just a quick note that this post isn't really about podcasts. It's about spending money strategically on things that matter--and about differentiating between regular spending and investing. Podcasts were just the example that made me shake my fist in anger.


I don't know if I'll do podcasts. If I do, I don't know if I'll charge. But you can be sure that this isn't going to become some podcast site. I love writing, and you can expect to read much, much more from me.

Posted by Ramit Sethi at September 12, 2006 03:23 PM
24.

Paying for podcasts is fine by me, if anything I feel they will be MORE valuable than the free info. We often apply a value to items based on what we pay. For example if someone gives me a blank sheet of paper, it will most likely get tossed in a bin or something (0 cost = 0 value). If I have to pay 25p for a piece of paper I'll make damn sure I get the best use I can out of it (much better value).


Asides from that, I am flat broke (hugely in debt actualy) but I bought a website last week because I beleive it will make me more than I paid for it. I beleive buying assets is a good thing, no matter what.


Keep up the great work.


Matt

Posted by Matt at September 12, 2006 03:38 PM
25.

I bought a new monitor to plug my notebook into. It felt great, no more excruciating neck pain.


Considering I work on a computer all day I'd be stupid not to have.


Hooray for me.

Posted by surly at September 12, 2006 03:48 PM
26.

Do you have an American drawl? If not, I'd pay. Otherwise I'll just settle for reading.

Posted by Jack Frost at September 12, 2006 03:56 PM
27.

Of course you should spend your time and money giving away something valuable for free. Jeez, people are crazy.

Posted by gr8face at September 12, 2006 04:15 PM
28.

The interent is bursting with high-quality investment advice (and some low-quality). I don't pay for any of it. You bet I understand the value of money... if so much good stuff is free, why part with cash? This whole person9 notion of "investing for your investments" is plausable, but do you really understand the enormous value of existing free services? Your focus on your reader opinions is misplaced. Examine the market you want to enter. I see your web site as a hobby in which you're the #1 student. Fine. And I'm sure you'll get some buyers. But the whole thing sorta makes me smirk.

Posted by John at September 12, 2006 05:35 PM
29.

Don't like podcasts.


I speedread so I can whip through written posts quickly.
Podcasts, can't do that, can I?
(or Ramit starts to sound like Minnie Mouse on speed).


Plus hard to multitask while watching a podcast. Usually I read posts, listen to my business shows and flip between tasks.


So I definitely wouldn't pay to watch a podcast.

Posted by Kimber at September 12, 2006 05:40 PM
30.

I bought a new bicycle the other day. A combination of just wanting to own a road bike, and a rational desire of wanting to ride to work instead of drive. Even bought it used, getting a nicer bike for way less.


I am excited.

Posted by Marshall at September 12, 2006 05:40 PM
31.

I actually just spent about $450 dollars on a 21" widescreen monitor two days ago. I had been puting off buying a new monitor for weeks. I kept going through the pros and cons of one that expensive versus others that are one, two, or maybe even three hundred dollars cheaper. Finally, I just took a deep breath and hit the "buy" button on the site. I'm still wondering whether I will regret spending that money (I'm on a student budget, but I've been saving money specifically for a monitor; I'm borrowing one right now from my girlfriend). Interestingly enough, I saw yesterday of Lifehacker that a bigger monitor is "The Best Computer Upgrade Ever" (http://www.slate.com/id/2149179/). Now today, I see Ramit telling me that I should buy something expensive if it is worth it. Well, I'm a comuter science major and I do quite a bit in graphic design, so I'll definitely get at least $450 dollars worth from it in its lifespan. Who knows what I'll use it for once I get out of college?

Posted by Ben at September 12, 2006 06:42 PM
32.

Great blog post!


This just reassured me that my subscriptions to the La Times, Business week, and Forbes is not in vain.

Posted by Miguel at September 12, 2006 07:06 PM
33.

So i had signed up for fool.com. I'm thinking "i can be a great fool, and learn how to properly make money!!!". SO, i read and participate and start learning. Then *BAM* the simple "put a nickel in the bank every day and it will grow" info was still available, but if you want to read this article on how to hedge this weeks stock, ya gotta pay!! And pay again, oh and can we interest you in these books we recommend at 20% savings, we won't tell you if they will help or not, but check them out. Oh, and want to post messages about finances and stock?? start ponying up the dough.


I guess bottom line, i don't mind paying for information or a service, but there has to be a forest through the tree's feeling, not a got em hooked now i up the anti to see how much i can bleed from them.

Posted by Charles Howlett at September 12, 2006 08:45 PM
34.

Charles, check out my post, "What is up with the Motley Fool?"

Posted by Ramit Sethi at September 12, 2006 08:48 PM
35.

Forget podcasts. I want to see video of your talks with Intel, college students, etc. I think that'd be neat.


As for spending for value, a Value Line Investment Survey subscription is around $600 a year. Seems expensive, but the information you get from that thing can help you make a lot of money.


"I don't know any other system that's as good." – Warren Buffett


So for $600, you get information that Warren Buffett holds in high regard. Worth it?


As for buying something, I'm going to pick up a Palm T/X to help me stay organized as my role at my firm changes as I progess. I've got more and more going on and less supervision, so my old organization methods aren't cutting it (pad and paper and memory worked fine for college and the first year of work). Also, reviewing documents and emails for the 45 minutes I'm on the bus some days will be invaluable to freeing up time for other stuff.

Posted by Carlin at September 12, 2006 08:55 PM
36.

I used to react similarly to those people that were angry about you charging money. I'm still only 20 but I've realized that paying for someone for quality content - or anything else - is only fair.


I used to scoff at the idea of paying for music, but in the past 2 years I've bought nearly every song on my playlists from iTunes. It only seems fair that artists, record companies, any everyone else that has a hand in producing the music I like get paid for their work.


It only seems fair that you would charge people for listening to quality content. The people who see the value of your website will surely pay you.

Posted by Ben at September 12, 2006 10:36 PM
37.

I might pay for a podcast, although a free trial episode might be nice (maybe an intro to what the paid episodes would cover, gives me a chance to see if the topics appeal and the sound quality is ok).


I would definitely pay for sections or all of the seminars you give - I live in Australia, so going in person isn't possible for me. Online pod/vidcast would be a great alternative imho.

Posted by JG at September 12, 2006 10:40 PM
38.

I don't listen to pods either, probably because I don't even know what one is. Like radio, but on my pc? If I had to download it then I wouldn't be willing to pay - too slow on my connection. I bet you didn't expect this response to your question about paying! ;)


The rest of your article was good - relavant to me anyway. Old as I am, I'm still learning how to spend wisely but not cheaply. Thanks.


Maybe after I research what the heck a podcast is then I'll earn your bonus points by investing in one.

Posted by Old Ipodclueless Lady at September 13, 2006 12:40 AM
39.

I took a day off work at my hourly job, my primary revenue source, to have lunch with a commodities trader I recently met. Total cost = $55 bill + ~$100 of foregone income. Absolutely worth it - I've made a friend that has real world experience in something that I am interested in, but lack real world experience in.

Posted by mark troutman at September 13, 2006 04:57 AM
40.

I won't be purchasing anything valuable this week, because two weeks ago I purchased a used truck. Without purchasing a vehicle, I wouldn't be able to get to and from work or to go out and enjoy myself. Using this truck to get to work, and go out and have fun, I will make up the cost of the vehicle in a little over a year.

Posted by Mike at September 13, 2006 08:23 AM
41.

Purchased the book:


"The ultimate no holds barred, kick butt, take no prisoners, guide to productivity & sanity" by Dan Kennedy.


Investment: $10.67 (and I bought it new...in an airport!)


I spend a lot of time analyzing goals and thinking of ways to increase my productivity and effectiveness in life. Turns out, so does this guy, and he's been doing it for longer than I've been alive - so needless to say, a lot of principles I am slowly starting to uncover on my own are explained in much greater detail and their value is much more clearly delineated. It would have taken me at least another ten years to: 1. be able to explain these principles and the ways in which they can be applied to my life and 2. be convinced of how important they are, how closely they are tied to one's success - however they choose to define it.


Thanks for the education, Ramit. It affects people's lives (in the form of ACTIONS, not just great discussions). Keep it up.

Posted by luke at September 13, 2006 09:04 AM
42.

Fresh out of college and employed for six months at my current job, I bought a car. A brand new shiny Scion xB, the cute ugly pug dog of modern vehicles.


I could have bought a used car, but I previously *had* a used car. I didn't want another one. I needed a small, affordable, no-frills car with more modern safety features, good mileage, high build quality, and enough space to actually move junk around (being young, I figured I'd be moving a lot, and surprise, I move a lot!)


I could have bought a 95 Civic or something for 2,000 dollars, but I bought a new car for about $16,000. I don't regret a single thing - I've already had my butt saved by the electronic save-your-butt features (ever had someone pull out in front of you and hit the brakes on an expressway at 75mph in the rain?), I've moved my partner's entire life 800 miles, and I get twice the gas mileage of my old car.

Posted by Hawk at September 13, 2006 10:16 AM

Leave your comment

NOTE
Fields marked with asterisk (*) are required.
:
:
:
remember me:
(You may use HTML tags for style)

getting started

This is a blog on personal finance (banking, saving, budgeting, and investing) and personal entrepreneurship.

It's for students, recent graduates, and other young people.

about me

Ramit Sethi

I'm a recent graduate of Stanford, where I studied technology and psychology. Now I'm an entrepreneur working on my own companies and consulting.

categories
stay tuned

Stay current with updates:
Sign up for the free newsletter...

...or use RSS / Atom feed:

RSS FeedAtom Feed